View Full Version : Drunk Chick Gets Tazed Multiple Times
tech-guy
September 23rd, 2007, 11:46 PM
http://www.filecabi.net/video/aptazegirlw.html
BleedingHeart23
September 24th, 2007, 01:10 AM
Every six seconds A woman is hit by her man. Now that we have found her, that man can finaly rest his hands! AMEN.
jimjam69
September 24th, 2007, 01:45 AM
TOUGH CHICK...LOL
FS88
September 24th, 2007, 01:56 AM
She seems like a head case, but Office 'Twinkie' is a close second.
Its a sorry day when a 6' - 240 lb cop can't handle a drunk woman half his weight.
Tazers should be meant for extreme situations.. that was not such a case.
Cops are more and more becoming thugs/bullies and no friend to average people.
paypalsucks.com
September 24th, 2007, 02:44 AM
She seems like a head case, but Office 'Twinkie' is a close second.
Its a sorry day when a 6' - 240 lb cop can't handle a drunk woman half his weight.
Tazers should be meant for extreme situations.. that was not such a case.
Cops are more and more becoming thugs/bullies and no friend to average people.
but she looked kinda jewy
Tha 216 Soulja
September 24th, 2007, 03:01 AM
She seems like a head case, but Office 'Twinkie' is a close second.
Its a sorry day when a 6' - 240 lb cop can't handle a drunk woman half his weight.
Tazers should be meant for extreme situations.. that was not such a case.
Cops are more and more becoming thugs/bullies and no friend to average people.
And what's sad is only a fraction of them are video taped and brought to light. Can you imagine how many more posts filecabi would have if everyone just carried around a video camera?
itsme
September 24th, 2007, 04:39 AM
Tasers are just a logic following of what you stupid americans do to your cops. You shoot them when they want to give you a ticket. You run over them if they try to stop your car. You spit at them when you got aids. You kick and punch them when they try to arrest you.
And now they tase you before you can do such shit to them. They also prevent you from going to jail for a longer time by not letting you injure them.
So american folks behappy about tasers and every time they are used. :xyxthumbs:
shawn awesome
September 24th, 2007, 05:42 AM
damn whats wrong with people
Avezion
September 24th, 2007, 05:44 AM
Quality and sound was too bad. coulden;t watch it
motofan130
September 24th, 2007, 05:55 AM
lol the cop got introuble for beating her off camera with a shotgun...watched this news clip yesterday
brownbearclan
September 24th, 2007, 06:01 AM
All that obnoxious ass drunk screaming was enough to validate a tazing. I feel sorry for the bastard that has to not only drive her to the station but book that drunken mess.
Have another drink ya dumb skank! People like that get no sympathy from me.
RiPMaV
September 24th, 2007, 07:57 AM
You spit at them when you got aids
i dont know if im wrong, but since when is it possible to contract aids through spit? well i heard that this virus is modifiing itself but did it become that complex?
back to the topic:
i would have tazed her too, since she obviously had rabies :rolleyes:
footballbat
September 24th, 2007, 08:44 AM
Tasers are just a logic following of what you stupid americans do to your cops. You shoot them when they want to give you a ticket. You run over them if they try to stop your car. You spit at them when you got aids. You kick and punch them when they try to arrest you.
And now they tase you before you can do such shit to them. They also prevent you from going to jail for a longer time by not letting you injure them.
So american folks behappy about tasers and every time they are used. :xyxthumbs:
That's right. We all carry weapons, and are belligerent to the authorities.:xyxthumbs:
You sir, post as one who could be mistaken for a moron.:1bluewinky:
On topic:
Was the cop afraid he might break a sweat? I thought they taught them guys hand-to-hand combat skills.
itsme
September 24th, 2007, 10:05 AM
Was the cop afraid he might break a sweat? I thought they taught them guys hand-to-hand combat skills.
Yeah you moron they do. And if the cops use them the headline is " Women beat down by cop " " Brutal Cop Arrests drunk whore "
Right?
footballbat
September 24th, 2007, 10:15 AM
Yeah you moron they do.
Tsk, tsk. We don't have to resort to personal attacks, do we? There is a fight room for that.
And if the cops use them the headline is " Women beat down by cop " " Brutal Cop Arrests drunk whore "
Right?
Wrong. Have you ever heard of an arm-bar? There are plenty of ways to make people cooperate, without having to beat them down.:xyxthumbs:
RiPMaV
September 24th, 2007, 10:28 AM
do you really think that would help on that scary witch?
i mean she was tazed for... about 1 minute and just kept screaming without realising that this wasnt the right thing to do....
well anyway, actually this tazing thing is a good thing cuz it doesnt leave any harm, only a little shock.
footballbat
September 24th, 2007, 10:33 AM
well anyway, actually this tazing thing is a good thing cuz it doesnt leave any harm, only a little shock.
The tazer actually has barbs, which penetrate the skin. People have also died, after being tazed. This should not be a weapon of first resort.
ceehound619
September 24th, 2007, 10:44 AM
The tazer actually has barbs, which penetrate the skin. People have also died, after being tazed. This should not be a weapon of first resort.
I both agree AND disagree somewhat... While I AGREE that the use of a tazer should not be a FIRST resort...police should NOT be risking injury "fighting" people in hand to hand combat....like it or not... their objective is to go home safe and non-injured everyday......why??? so they can go to work the next day and deal with more drunk,belligerent imbeciles such as this particular "lady".... the tazer helps to accomplish this.
RiPMaV
September 24th, 2007, 10:44 AM
well my point is, its better than shooting someone. and assuming from those weird screams she made it would be possible that she wouldve attacked you with a knife or her lipstick, which btw can also cause death if used properly.
and i know that people CAN die if they are being tazed, especially when they have a pacemaker, but its still way more friendly then being beaten.
and since we dont see everythign i think that the cops tried to calm her down in the first place, but since it didnt work at all they just tazed her.
Nilez
September 24th, 2007, 11:18 AM
well my point is, its better than shooting someone. and assuming from those weird screams she made it would be possible that she wouldve attacked you with a knife or her lipstick, which btw can also cause death if used properly.
and i know that people CAN die if they are being tazed, especially when they have a pacemaker, but its still way more friendly then being beaten.
and since we dont see everythign i think that the cops tried to calm her down in the first place, but since it didnt work at all they just tazed her.
How do you kill someone using a lipstick?
Don't get me wrong-I am NOT sympathizing with the drunk trash ho, but she was NO danger to these cops. The tazer is supposed to used to subdue DANGEROUS people. Her screaming made me feel like smashing her one, but the cops can't go tazing people because they're irritating.
And BTW, the tazer is not "just a little shock"-it causes about as much pain as you can remain concious though.
RiPMaV
September 24th, 2007, 11:56 AM
you just have to be creative and a little lucky.
well im not exactly sure that you could actually kill someone, but the possiblity of great harm exists, one wrong move while histericaly waving your arms around with a lipstik in your hand can cause someone to loose one eye.
and if you dont calm down and cant talk and just fuckin scream around like a burning witch even tho they tried to calm you down, im assuming that this was the right thing to do. but who am i to judge so lets keep it like that.
PlaneswalkerX
September 24th, 2007, 12:03 PM
do you really think that would help on that scary witch?
i mean she was tazed for... about 1 minute and just kept screaming without realising that this wasnt the right thing to do....
well anyway, actually this tazing thing is a good thing cuz it doesnt leave any harm, only a little shock.
Even though I have never personally been tased but I have touched an electric fence and it is probably a similar experience. It is hard to think rationally when electricity is going through your body via sharp barbs stuck into your skin. Tasers are for cops that run into some 250 lb guy that is saying something like "I wish a cop would...". I don't think it is necessary to tase a little drunk bitch when you could grab her by one arm, throw some cuffs on her, and put her in the fucking backseat. I also think the cop held the button down way too long. I was waiting for the batteries to run out. He is holding it down the whole time he is telling her to get out. She basically falls out of the car and then he stops for a second. A little shock? I would rather take about 10 beatings than get tased. I would love for a cop to run into someone that could somehow take the shock and they just look at the cop when they get tased and laugh.
paulbrown49
September 24th, 2007, 12:10 PM
he should of tazed her gob and shut her up.
footballbat
September 24th, 2007, 12:15 PM
I would love for a cop to run into someone that could somehow take the shock and they just look at the cop when they get tased and laugh.
Then the cop would have to shoot someone.
BTW, an electric fence is not comparable to a tazer, or a stun gun.
VINCE NOIR MOD
September 24th, 2007, 02:09 PM
What a classy gal.Screaming,drunken,obnoxious piggy.Deserves every ass beating she gets.Some people should kill themselves before they lose all of their integrity by becoming pathetic drunken retards!!!!
HeyBuddy
September 24th, 2007, 03:36 PM
She seems like a head case, but Office 'Twinkie' is a close second.
Its a sorry day when a 6' - 240 lb cop can't handle a drunk woman half his weight.
Tazers should be meant for extreme situations.. that was not such a case.
Cops are more and more becoming thugs/bullies and no friend to average people.
Well, anytime a male officer puts his hands on a female to restrain her he gets in trouble. You're damned if you do, and damned if you don't. We didn't see the entire event, but I know when an officer says to put my hands behind my back I don't jump up and flail my arms. Just my opinion.
And what's sad is only a fraction of them are video taped and brought to light. Can you imagine how many more posts filecabi would have if everyone just carried around a video camera?
What's really sad is that they I've never had a camera to video tape when an officer showed compassion and gave me a warning. It's sad that I didn't video tape the officer who came out, and not only filled out a report about my shed being broken into, but actually helped me put the door back together before he left. What's sad is that there is no video footage of the off duty officer, who gave his life to protect a woman who was being mugged in Mishawaka, IN. What is really sad is that people will judge everyone in the law enforcement profession due to a few videos that may or may not tell the entire story. Yet, when those same people have a problem, they call the police. Those same people that call the police, power-hungry pigs, will see a video of someone acting like a jerk and say, "I would beat that guys ass".
PlaneswalkerX
September 24th, 2007, 03:38 PM
Then the cop would have to shoot someone.
BTW, an electric fence is not comparable to a tazer, or a stun gun.
I think a cop would run if he tazed someone and it didn't affect them. I also didn't say that touching an electric fence is comparable to being tazed. I said it was similar experience, meaning that it is an electric shock that hurts like hell.
FS88
September 24th, 2007, 04:12 PM
Well, anytime a male officer puts his hands on a female to restrain her he gets in trouble. You're damned if you do, and damned if you don't. We didn't see the entire event, but I know when an officer says to put my hands behind my back I don't jump up and flail my arms. Just my opinion.
True, but I think he could handle her without the need for being excessive.
As for her going crazy - I'd chalk that up to drugs/booze.
But more then one tase is too much. These things drop grown men, and don't come in his/hers versions.
Nailing her once is bad.. multi times, then going on to a further attack ( believe thats what someone mentioned) was bad.
artgod33
September 24th, 2007, 04:13 PM
How come no one has commented ont he sweet face plant the bitch does up against the side of the car.
that was fucking sweet!
HeyBuddy
September 24th, 2007, 04:27 PM
True, but I think he could handle her without the need for being excessive.
As for her going crazy - I'd chalk that up to drugs/booze.
But more then one tase is too much. These things drop grown men, and don't come in his/hers versions.
Nailing her once is bad.. multi times, then going on to a further attack ( believe thats what someone mentioned) was bad.
A buddy of mine has invented and patented a new set of handcuffs that would eliminate this. Unfortunately, there are a lot of hoops to jump through if you want to sell these to a police department.
Basically, instead of the old chain in between, they are made of a very strong strap (reminds me of a tow strap). In the center is a mechanism that connects the two sections of strap. All together, it's probably about 4 feet long. This allows you to cuff each wrist seperately. Then, you grab the handles on the straps and pull them through the mechanism in the center, which pulls their wrists together. At my peak, I could bench 630 lbs, so he used me to test them. I can tell you with 100% confidence that the way these are designed, renders your personal strength useless. Your hands WILL come together. Once your hands are together, it takes a key to unlock the mechanism. The cuffs on the end are no different than your run of the mill handcuffs.
The big liablity fear is that someone will fight the restraints too hard and seperate a shoulder. Again, it's a no win situation when people don't comply.
Raidenator
September 24th, 2007, 07:26 PM
I would love for a cop to run into someone that could somehow take the shock and they just look at the cop when they get tased and laugh.
Uh...good luck with that. There's no such thing as "taking the shock". Have you not watched the hundreds of videos of hardcore marines and shit "taking the shock"? They get about half a second before they collapse.
Most of the guys in this thread are a bunch of bleeding hearts. I've been tased, it's not that bad. Yeah sure, it hurts like a bitch during, but afterwards there's absolutely no lasting pain. I feel it for maybe 30 seconds and it's gone. That's comparable to say, breaking the offender's arm? Hm. I'll stick with being tased thank you.
Oh, and I'm not defending the cop. He's still a douche, but tasers aren't bad.
Curmudgeon
September 24th, 2007, 07:28 PM
OK, this guy's probably gonna lose his job.
skunk the disc golfer
September 24th, 2007, 07:58 PM
Well I don't know about you, but it would be hard for me to have control of my body when I'm getting tazed. I mean shit, it sounded like she was wanting to cooperate. Besides, shouldn't that pig have called in a female officer? I do believe that is what they have to do now a days......isn't it?
Where the hell did this take place? Was that squad car a taxi first? Where's the cage and glass?
I haven't had time to read all of the posts. Therefore, I appologize for any duplication. :smokin:
Curmudgeon
September 24th, 2007, 08:28 PM
Well no, if you watch a tape that doesn't cut off the initial contact, it's clear that she's in no mood to cooperate. But she's also not physically resisting either. This cop was way, way too quick and enthusiastic with the taser. He probably won't get out of this without at least a suspension.
RiPMaV
September 24th, 2007, 08:32 PM
she really was trying to cooperate at the end when she was screaming like a siren and kicking against the window....
oh, seems like she actually was tazed while inside, lol
alcohol is bad
note to myself: dont kick the window while being restrained
Jim28
September 24th, 2007, 08:56 PM
She seems like a head case, but Office 'Twinkie' is a close second.
Its a sorry day when a 6' - 240 lb cop can't handle a drunk woman half his weight.
Tazers should be meant for extreme situations.. that was not such a case.
Cops are more and more becoming thugs/bullies and no friend to average people.
Tazers are meant to be for extreme situations. But we as people let cops do what ever they want. Sooner or later they will all act like this because we let it go to far.
Curmudgeon
September 24th, 2007, 09:11 PM
Tazers are meant to be for extreme situations. But we as people let cops do what ever they want. Sooner or later they will all act like this because we let it go to far.
This seems to be a common misconception that motivates so much anger among people whenever a taser is deployed. They are not meant just for "extreme situations." They can be deployed at any time when a person physically resists arrest. They can be used in other "extreme" or "extraordinary" circumstances, but your common everyday physical resistance is sufficient to receive a volt massage.
yup
September 24th, 2007, 09:19 PM
What's really sad is that they I've never had a camera to video tape when an officer showed compassion and gave me a warning. It's sad that I didn't video tape the officer who came out, and not only filled out a report about my shed being broken into, but actually helped me put the door back together before he left. What's sad is that there is no video footage of the off duty officer, who gave his life to protect a woman who was being mugged in Mishawaka, IN. What is really sad is that people will judge everyone in the law enforcement profession due to a few videos that may or may not tell the entire story. Yet, when those same people have a problem, they call the police. Those same people that call the police, power-hungry pigs, will see a video of someone acting like a jerk and say, "I would beat that guys ass".
Well put:xyxthumbs:
VagabondElement
September 24th, 2007, 09:39 PM
When the video first started, I thought it was a little excessive to go right for the tazer. But by the end of the video, when the bitch didn't shut the fuck up after already having been fucking electricuted, I was hoping he'd taze her big noisy mouth.
Learn your lesson and shut up you fat dumb bitch. There's nothing more annoying than someone who just screams and screams, man or woman. Actually, it's more annoying when you see a man do it....
Termi0n
September 24th, 2007, 09:45 PM
Looking at the way the bitch was screaming her head off and trying to kick out the back seat window even AFTER being tazed tells me she most likely deserved every volt. :xyxthumbs:
Especially if she was trying to drive/driving that drunk.
footballbat
September 24th, 2007, 10:23 PM
I think a cop would run if he tazed someone and it didn't affect them.
Highly unlikely. In a high-stress situation, you fall back on your training. Why do think cops tell a subject to stop resisting, while hitting them. If you said training, give yourself a handjob, because you got the right answer.
I also didn't say that touching an electric fence is comparable to being tazed. I said it was similar experience, meaning that it is an electric shock that hurts like hell.
Main Entry: sim·i·lar
Pronunciation: 'si-m&-l&r, 'sim-l&r
Function: adjective
Etymology: French similaire, from Latin similis like, similar -- more at SAME
1 : having characteristics in common : strictly comparable
2 : alike in substance or essentials : CORRESPONDING <no two animal habitats are exactly similar -- W. H. Dowdeswell>
3 : not differing in shape but only in size or position <similar triangles> <similar polygons>
Main Entry: com·pa·ra·ble
Pronunciation: 'käm-p(&-)r&-b&l also k&m-'pa-r&-b&l, -'per-&-
Function: adjective
1 : capable of or suitable for comparison
2 : SIMILAR, LIKE <fabrics of comparable quality>
Most of the guys in this thread are a bunch of bleeding hearts. I've been tased, it's not that bad. Yeah sure, it hurts like a bitch during, but afterwards there's absolutely no lasting pain. I feel it for maybe 30 seconds and it's gone. That's comparable to say, breaking the offender's arm? Hm. I'll stick with being tased thank you.
I never mentioned breaking someones arm. A properly applied arm-bar will give you enough leverage on your adversary, to restrain them without any damage. Joint locks don't have to damage the person they're applied to.
Well I don't know about you, but it would be hard for me to have control of my body when I'm getting tazed. I mean shit, it sounded like she was wanting to cooperate. Besides, shouldn't that pig have called in a female officer? I do believe that is what they have to do now a days......isn't it?
C'mon dude. The pig thing is rather tiring. Cops are susceptible to stupid human behavior, just like everyone. How would you like it if, while performing your job, everyone you came in contact with was in a foul mood. Whether they're good people, or bad, the cop usually comes in contact with them during shitty situations.:2twocents:
skunk the disc golfer
September 24th, 2007, 10:35 PM
C'mon dude. The pig thing is rather tiring. Cops are susceptible to stupid human behavior, just like everyone. How would you like it if, while performing your job, everyone you came in contact with was in a foul mood. Whether they're good people, or bad, the cop usually comes in contact with them during shitty situations.:2twocents:
I read what you had to say, and I understand that it is usually the civilian that sparks the issues. Being that, I've found that when I am calm and show the officer respect, I am usually granted the same response. Police have bad days too....sometimes worse than mine.
Therefore, I will try to refrain from the pig reference (footballbat encouraged). But I will give credit where credit is due. :smokin:
eroc69
September 25th, 2007, 11:42 AM
How do you kill someone using a lipstick?
Don't get me wrong-I am NOT sympathizing with the drunk trash ho, but she was NO danger to these cops. The tazer is supposed to used to subdue DANGEROUS people. Her screaming made me feel like smashing her one, but the cops can't go tazing people because they're irritating.
And BTW, the tazer is not "just a little shock"-it causes about as much pain as you can remain concious though.
Everybody assumes that women can do no harm.. ie "How do you kill someone using a lipstick?"
Guess what women are just as capable of carrying weapons as males are. When you ASSUME things while in a confrontation thats is when officers get hurt. She was ordered out of the vehicle, did not comply, therefore she gets tazed. end of story.
FYI: When males and females are both in vehicles, alot of times the males give the females any illegal items they have because they know alot of male officers do not search them, when warranted. This includes guns, knives, tasers, drugs..
footballbat
September 25th, 2007, 02:04 PM
She was ordered out of the vehicle, did not comply, therefore she gets tazed. end of story.
Bullshit. Unless the chick looks like Large Marge.
For God's sake, the cop obviously outweighed her by at least 100 lbs. I don't care if the chick is a trained martial artist, if you weigh considerably more, and have the fighting skills that cops should possess, you should be able to mash the little lady with minimal effort. If you're going to reach for your taser, every time someone is being belligerent, you don't deserve to wear the uniform.
"To serve and protect" does not imply use of a taser because someone isn't cooperating. If she had jumped out to attack the officer, then he might be justified. I saw nothing on her part to warrant the multiple tasings. All I saw was a power hungry fat cop, who probably hates women, because his wife's a frigid bitch, and he has to crysturbate himself to sleep at night.
Curmudgeon
September 25th, 2007, 03:11 PM
Bullshit. Unless the chick looks like Large Marge.
For God's sake, the cop obviously outweighed her by at least 100 lbs. I don't care if the chick is a trained martial artist, if you weigh considerably more, and have the fighting skills that cops should possess, you should be able to mash the little lady with minimal effort. If you're going to reach for your taser, every time someone is being belligerent, you don't deserve to wear the uniform.
This is a perfect example of the misunderstanding of the purpose of tasers in the context of law enforcement. The whole purpose of tasers is to avoid hand-to-hand combat in the first place, not as a weapon to be used once combat has commenced. What you're basically advocating is that the officer should beat the hell out of the lady if that's what it takes to subdue her and if he's capable of doing so. Well, that's just stupid (as much as this broad could use a good ass-beating). The whole point of tasers is to prevent people from getting injured -- both officers and arrestees. I promise you tasers have prevented far more successful lawsuits than they have caused.
This officer's legal problem is not so much that he deployed the taser; he was probably within procedural discretion to deploy it to gain her compliance to get out of the car when she rather steadfastly refused to do so, which was edited out of this version of the video (probably to paint the officer in the worst possible light). His problem is that he was continually using it when she was just lying on the ground. In short, his problem is that it appears he did not give her sufficient opportunity to come into compliance once it was deployed.
footballbat
September 25th, 2007, 03:29 PM
What you're basically advocating is that the officer should beat the hell out of the lady if that's what it takes to subdue her and if he's capable of doing so.
Nothing could be further from the truth. If you people would pay some damned attention, you would understand what I'm trying to say. You don't have to beat the hell out of somebody, to make them comply.
Have you ever heard of a wrist-lock? Or an arm-bar? These are things cops are (or should be) taught, as pain-compliance techniques. Properly applied, it takes a minimum amount of effort to make even the most belligerent person do what you want.
Curmudgeon
September 25th, 2007, 04:28 PM
Nothing could be further from the truth. If you people would pay some damned attention, you would understand what I'm trying to say. You don't have to beat the hell out of somebody, to make them comply. I did pay attention to what you read. And this is what I saw: I don't care if the chick is a trained martial artist, if you weigh considerably more, and have the fighting skills that cops should possess, you should be able to mash the little lady with minimal effort. If you're going to reach for your taser, every time someone is being belligerent, you don't deserve to wear the uniform. Maybe there's some other understanding of “mash” in this context that I'm not aware of. Or maybe you should be more clear when choosing your words. Have you ever heard of a wrist-lock? Or an arm-bar? These are things cops are (or should be) taught, as pain-compliance techniques. Properly applied, it takes a minimum amount of effort to make even the most belligerent person do what you want. “Properly applied” is the key term here. In the controlled environment of combat-training, it's possible to “properly apply” them easily. Out in the field, it's not always such a tidy proposition and opportunities to engage a wrist-lock or an arm-bar don't always neatly and conveniently present themselves at the precise time when compliance is sought. Not to mention that they both pose a risk of injury to the arrestee and they are both defeatable by a person who also knows what he is doing. Additionally, any time an officer has to use physical contact to subdue an arrestee, it increases the risk of injury to himself and the arrestee -- not to mention close contact gives the arrestee easier access to the officer's weapons. These are the risks that tasers are designed to mitigate. So far, the taser has proven by far to be the best way to achieve the objective of compelling compliance of belligerent arrestees while minimizing the risks of injury to both the officer and the arrestee. Even absent these risks and the desire to minimize them, I don't understand why a wrist-lock or arm-bar are supposedly superior pain-compliance techniques than a taser, short of some bizarre sense of honor or fairness or whatever. Pain compliance is pain compliance. What difference does it make what method you use to achieve it?
loadrunner
September 25th, 2007, 04:34 PM
If someone tazed me, I would get hellish, and kick some ass.... after they stop.
footballbat
September 25th, 2007, 04:36 PM
Some people have health problems, that an electric shock might agitate.
It just seems to me that some police are too quick to pull the taser, before other means are attempted. That might not be the case here, since, as you pointed out, the initial confrontation was edited out. However, the fact that the cop continued to tase the woman while she was on the ground, makes me hesitant to think that he attempted other means of compliance.
Edit: Perhaps mash wasn't the right word. I think you got the point, though.
HeyBuddy
September 25th, 2007, 04:43 PM
I think everyone who gets arrested should be tazed just before they are booked. I think that would be a great lesson. Tazings for everyone. Get in line. Even if you were just in the wrong place at the wrong time, how about a quick taze in the small of the back? It's fun for the whole family. Parents should carry a taser for their kids, when they get unruly. I SAID SIT DOWN....bbuuzz, buuzz... Hell, yeah. Taze the world.
99killersushi99
September 25th, 2007, 09:09 PM
YEAH! You kick my window and youll get it again!...I loved it when they kicked my widow...or turned on my windshield wipers with their legs in the air.
Raidenator
September 25th, 2007, 11:46 PM
I never mentioned breaking someones arm. A properly applied arm-bar will give you enough leverage on your adversary, to restrain them without any damage. Joint locks don't have to damage the person they're applied to.
C'mon dude. The pig thing is rather tiring. Cops are susceptible to stupid human behavior, just like everyone. How would you like it if, while performing your job, everyone you came in contact with was in a foul mood. Whether they're good people, or bad, the cop usually comes in contact with them during shitty situations.:2twocents:
I realize I'm a bit late to the party but....
I know you didn't mention breaking somebody's arm, but shit happens. I've watched countless videos of cops and seen them in action for real. If they're not using a tazer and they have to take the guy to the ground, those guys go down HARD. Not to mention the people who are whole heartedly fighting back in which a baton is used. Baton's break bones. Anyway, I'm saying that with a tazer they aren't being literally thrown to the ground, and I think in normal cases with a healthy...eh...recipient, it's the much better way to deal with the situation. That way you don't have to deal with BSI (body substance isolation), suspect resisting, needing 5 cops to restrain one person, etc.
You're right, a good arm-bard would be ideal but most situations are not quite so simple. In this video it was a male cop VS. small woman. That would be a good situation to avoid the tazer but I'm not arguing about the video. I'm saying that if the threat of injury or resistance avoidable, why try and do things the hard way?
2nd paragraph is good though. Kudos for that.
Captain Obvious
September 25th, 2007, 11:52 PM
Tasers are just a logic following of what you stupid americans do to your cops. You shoot them when they want to give you a ticket. You run over them if they try to stop your car. You spit at them when you got aids. You kick and punch them when they try to arrest you.
And now they tase you before you can do such shit to them. They also prevent you from going to jail for a longer time by not letting you injure them.
So american folks behappy about tasers and every time they are used. :xyxthumbs:
I agree with you Mr. American hater. You are 100% correct. Tasers save lives and bruises on the culprits. The only time they are used is when people don't follow their instructions.
Curmudgeon
September 26th, 2007, 12:45 AM
Wow, it's even worse than I thought. Here's some additional footage of this knob tasering her some more, for no apparent reason, while she's in cuffs, when she's being transfered from one cruiser to another. This guy's career future isn't looking too good.
KMpEr-MOSyk
GinerJab
September 26th, 2007, 04:15 PM
Got what she deserved.
footballbat
September 26th, 2007, 08:27 PM
Another justified use of a taser?
u2mTLJi6rHo
LiquidNinja
September 26th, 2007, 11:18 PM
Uh...good luck with that. There's no such thing as "taking the shock". Have you not watched the hundreds of videos of hardcore marines and shit "taking the shock"? They get about half a second before they collapse.
Most of the guys in this thread are a bunch of bleeding hearts. I've been tased, it's not that bad. Yeah sure, it hurts like a bitch during, but afterwards there's absolutely no lasting pain. I feel it for maybe 30 seconds and it's gone. That's comparable to say, breaking the offender's arm? Hm. I'll stick with being tased thank you.
Oh, and I'm not defending the cop. He's still a douche, but tasers aren't bad.
Tasers "aren't that bad"? That's a load of horsedung. The models that police carry are somewhere at or above 40,000 volts. I've gotten hit by the line side of an electrical service wire (which carries 10,000 volts after the transformer) and it hurts like a bitch, not to mention the fact that your muscles don't respond properly for about 30 minutes afterward. "No lasting pain"? That 10,000 volts was with me for at least 10 minutes afterward. You're probably thinking of one of the personal defense 'stun guns' that do nothing more than tweak your muscles wherever they hit you.
Kelsta
September 26th, 2007, 11:22 PM
I don't know about the USA, but here in australia a police officer has to be hit with a taser twice before they are ever alowed to carry one.
And i don't believe this mentality. Yes, a police officer has the right not to be injured, however a eliment of risk is involved with every job, if he was trained in restraint hold correctly, as all police officers in Australia are, he should have had no problem removing her from that car without the use a taser, this is just police gettign fucking lazy.
Even after he delpoyed it, once she was on the ground, his first act should have been phyically restraining her, not standing there waiting for her to put her hand behind her back.
LiquidNinja
September 26th, 2007, 11:38 PM
I don't know about the USA, but here in australia a police officer has to be hit with a taser twice before they are ever alowed to carry one.
And i don't believe this mentality. Yes, a police officer has the right not to be injured, however a eliment of risk is involved with every job, if he was trained in restraint hold correctly, as all police officers in Australia are, he should have had no problem removing her from that car without the use a taser, this is just police gettign fucking lazy.
Even after he delpoyed it, once she was on the ground, his first act should have been phyically restraining her, not standing there waiting for her to put her hand behind her back.
Well said. Not to mention the other video from the local news showing the officer zapping her again as she totaly complied with his order to walk to another car. That's the problem with these things, little to no regulation of use. They have no limit on how long they can hit you, or on how many times. That's dangerous shit. 110 volts can kill anyone under the right conditions, for example, if you are leaning against metal, that grounds you, allowing the electricity to pass straight through. If your heart is in between the entry and the grounded point, it can quite easily cause your heart to stop working. Even a sweaty person is at much greater risk of permanent injury than a dry person. But thats enough ranting from me for today though.
Curmudgeon
September 26th, 2007, 11:49 PM
Tasers "aren't that bad"? That's a load of horsedung. The models that police carry are somewhere at or above 40,000 volts. I've gotten hit by the line side of an electrical service wire (which carries 10,000 volts after the transformer) and it hurts like a bitch, not to mention the fact that your muscles don't respond properly for about 30 minutes afterward. "No lasting pain"? That 10,000 volts was with me for at least 10 minutes afterward. You're probably thinking of one of the personal defense 'stun guns' that do nothing more than tweak your muscles wherever they hit you.
That's all a Taser is. I hate to be cliche, but when it comes to actual physical harm, it's not the volts that matter as much as the amps. That 10,000-volt line you got hit was carrying anywhere from under 100 to over 1,000 amps, and under the right circumstances, 1 amp is enough to kill a person. Tasers have about 0.002 amps. That's, you know, a slight difference between the several (maybe hundreds) of amps that hit you. That's why the short-term and possibly long-term effects are very different between being hit by a service wire and getting tasered -- such as, say, a couple minute's worth of discomfort versus an infinity of death.
Raidenator
September 26th, 2007, 11:56 PM
Tasers "aren't that bad"? That's a load of horsedung. The models that police carry are somewhere at or above 40,000 volts. I've gotten hit by the line side of an electrical service wire (which carries 10,000 volts after the transformer) and it hurts like a bitch, not to mention the fact that your muscles don't respond properly for about 30 minutes afterward. "No lasting pain"? That 10,000 volts was with me for at least 10 minutes afterward. You're probably thinking of one of the personal defense 'stun guns' that do nothing more than tweak your muscles wherever they hit you.
Curmudgeon already said it.
Besides, you do know that officers have to be tased in order to carry a taser right?
I'll go ahead and add a video of people being tased to prove that afterwards they are more than capable of getting up and moving around just fine.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SFSW44UPgwQ
borrelli
September 27th, 2007, 01:49 AM
I've seen 250lb drunks NOT get tazered. They usually get handled by a couple of 250lb cops. I'm gonna go neutral on this. She was being a beligerent snatch though. The way she kissed the bumper though made me chuckle in a sick kind of way.
LiquidNinja
September 28th, 2007, 08:41 AM
Curmudgeon already said it.
Besides, you do know that officers have to be tased in order to carry a taser right?
I'll go ahead and add a video of people being tased to prove that afterwards they are more than capable of getting up and moving around just fine.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=SFSW44UPgwQ
Wow, a bunch of marines, hanging out with their friends, getting hit for 3 seconds each while they are gently laid down, compared to a drunk woman getting screamed at by a big-ass cop, getting hit like seven times for about 10-15 seconds each time, falling and smacking her grill on her own car? Nice comparison.
LiquidNinja
September 28th, 2007, 08:46 AM
That's all a Taser is. I hate to be cliche, but when it comes to actual physical harm, it's not the volts that matter as much as the amps. That 10,000-volt line you got hit was carrying anywhere from under 100 to over 1,000 amps, and under the right circumstances, 1 amp is enough to kill a person. Tasers have about 0.002 amps. That's, you know, a slight difference between the several (maybe hundreds) of amps that hit you. That's why the short-term and possibly long-term effects are very different between being hit by a service wire and getting tasered -- such as, say, a couple minute's worth of discomfort versus an infinity of death.
That 10,000 volt line that hit me wasn't carrying any amps, as it wasn't yet connected to the meter or the panel, nor was I grounded or touching the neutral line. Had any of those things been true, it would have locked me on and possibly killed me.
boo_cocky
September 28th, 2007, 05:49 PM
Tasers are just a logic following of what you stupid americans do to your cops. You shoot them when they want to give you a ticket. You run over them if they try to stop your car. You spit at them when you got aids. You kick and punch them when they try to arrest you.
And now they tase you before you can do such shit to them. They also prevent you from going to jail for a longer time by not letting you injure them.
So american folks behappy about tasers and every time they are used. :xyxthumbs:
Somebody needs a 'I'm sorry you aren't fortunate enough to be American' hug!
mmmmm...she was quite the screamer!
Raidenator
September 29th, 2007, 01:21 AM
Wow, a bunch of marines, hanging out with their friends, getting hit for 3 seconds each while they are gently laid down, compared to a drunk woman getting screamed at by a big-ass cop, getting hit like seven times for about 10-15 seconds each time, falling and smacking her grill on her own car? Nice comparison.
Wow, did you miss the part of me not defending the cop? I never said he was right, I said that the taser wasn't the problem.
Oh and you're right, she WAS drunk. Being drunk makes her a better candidate to be tased, because she's not thinking clearly, she's fighting, and she's deadened to pain.
Cry me a river lineworker.
HeyBuddy
September 29th, 2007, 01:27 AM
AGAIN, AGAIN, AGAIN!!!
Curmudgeon
September 29th, 2007, 08:40 AM
That 10,000 volt line that hit me wasn't carrying any amps, as it wasn't yet connected to the meter or the panel, nor was I grounded or touching the neutral line. Had any of those things been true, it would have locked me on and possibly killed me.
How can it have not been carrying "any" amps? If there were no amps, then there was no current.
Raidenator
September 29th, 2007, 12:52 PM
How can it have not been carrying "any" amps? If there were no amps, then there was no current.
Exactly what I was thinking, no current means no shock.
jacksquatdiddly
September 29th, 2007, 01:18 PM
Why don;'t you also do the opposite of what the police ask of you when they have a tazer on hand?
Monstermash
September 29th, 2007, 05:56 PM
All that screaming she was doing, I thought she was having a multiple orgasm :D
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.