View Full Version : Dr. Phil vs. Bum Fights Producer
FileCabi.net
December 14th, 2006, 07:04 AM
Dr. Phil vs. Bum Fights Producer
http://www.filecabi.net/video/bumfights-drphil.html
g-guna
December 14th, 2006, 07:39 AM
1st in 5 rounds i want this do aIIway on time hehe!
DriZ
December 14th, 2006, 07:48 AM
1st in 5 rounds i want this do aIIway on time hehe!
god.. -_-
As for the clip, I find it quite weird why he invites the guy knowing the subject, shows a tape he prob seen before, then says he don't want to talk about it cause "it's an insult to my intelligence".
As for the guys hair, lmao
Big Ozzie
December 14th, 2006, 08:00 AM
Dr Phil is a pathetic, pussy whipped, douche bag.
DriZ is right, no way in Hell did Dr Phil not know what was going to be shown or talked about before the show. These shows are planned weeks and sometimes months in advance. They are discussed by the producers and Dr Phil and investigated. All he wanted was a chance to throw someone off his stage and look like a friggin hero!
davious
December 14th, 2006, 08:04 AM
agreed, he's set the whole thing up, Was the good Dr. afraid of the alternative view this other guy might have?
He seems to of lost the plot ...
wimp out
Brixton
December 14th, 2006, 08:08 AM
Yeah, that sucks bad, the Dr dude obviusly new what was in that vid, probably watched it in rehersals.
So he just got that guy on to throw him off?
Maybe it was the piss take haircut the dude had?
Maybe its jelousy cos hes made millions off it?
Maybe The Doctor needs to see a doctor?
And the crowd are like sheep, they should have booed him for getting rid of the guest.
Dr Phil = Prime twat
http://www.global-air.com/global/graphics/top%20dr%20phil.gif
d4nimal666
December 14th, 2006, 08:50 AM
love the dude's hair lol best part of that video BUMFIGHTS 4 plz
sariusmonk
December 14th, 2006, 09:17 AM
That hair was hillarious
lochack
December 14th, 2006, 09:26 AM
He should have sat with him and discussed why he was doing that, because he is a Psychologist. Maybe that guy have some childhood problems or something? Like the other person said “he just wanted to act like a hero in front of audiences”
Nervchild
December 14th, 2006, 10:53 AM
who says money dosent change people, hahahahaha
Snugglez
December 14th, 2006, 11:00 AM
LMAO I like how he tried to look like Dr. Phil. That was fucking funny.
silenthill22
December 14th, 2006, 11:08 AM
LMAO I like how he tried to look like Dr. Phil. That was fucking funny.
lmao maybe that's the real reason he kicked him off the show
and i agree Phil was fully aware of what he was about to talk about and had to of seen some clips before hand I.O.W. he's full of shit
Big Ozzie
December 14th, 2006, 11:10 AM
LMAO I like how he tried to look like Dr. Phil. That was fucking funny.
I believe that you hit the nail on the head, Snugglez. This guy cut his hair and shaved his head to make fun of Dr Phil...and the wacko Dr couldn't take the ribbing.
LMAO, what a PUSSY!
burns
December 14th, 2006, 12:03 PM
the guy was there to use phil . phil used him first. works for me
maurice
December 14th, 2006, 12:18 PM
well im kind of on phil's side but that guy had some decent arguments, while phil provided the audience with exactly 0. yet they all instinctively cheered like fucking morons. sheeps like someone said... i hate people like that.
as for the haircut hahah. he deserved to get thrown off for it though, obviously if you want to have a decent discussion with someone in order to prove your point, mocking him is a not a good way to start.
Oni-Neko
December 14th, 2006, 12:26 PM
well im kind of on phil's side but that guy had some decent arguments, while phil provided the audience with exactly 0. yet they all instinctively cheered like fucking morons. sheeps like someone said... i hate people like that.
Decent arguments? This is ridiculous. $20 to a homeless person to eat a raw frog? That's not providing them a service, that -is- exploitation. He's not putting these people to work, he's bribing them to allow them to exploit them. Putting them to work would be paying them a -lot- more than a bottle of JD for yanking a tooth out, or whatever.
I've seen bumfights videos, and this jackass is not providing any sort of service to anyone but himself.
Methinks Dr. Phil did one of the best things he could. Seems to me that he suddenly realized that there was no way he could have a constructive conversation with this prick, so he threw him off the show.
"I'm not done talking to you!" "Yeah you are." "No I'm not!" "Yeah you are." Hilarious!
Inferno
December 14th, 2006, 01:37 PM
Dr.Phil = Child Molester.
Bumfights FTW..kekeke
the fact is, Phil just wanted to embarrass this guy by bringing him onto the show, just to send him off of it. The producer probably would have won the debate if he had talked to him.
ZombieBunny
December 14th, 2006, 01:42 PM
bumfights? wtf, only in america...
maurice
December 14th, 2006, 01:43 PM
well im kind of on phil's side but that guy had some decent arguments, while phil provided the audience with exactly 0. yet they all instinctively cheered like fucking morons. sheeps like someone said... i hate people like that.
Decent arguments? This is ridiculous. $20 to a homeless person to eat a raw frog? That's not providing them a service, that -is- exploitation. He's not putting these people to work, he's bribing them to allow them to exploit them. Putting them to work would be paying them a -lot- more than a bottle of JD for yanking a tooth out, or whatever.
I've seen bumfights videos, and this jackass is not providing any sort of service to anyone but himself.
Methinks Dr. Phil did one of the best things he could. Seems to me that he suddenly realized that there was no way he could have a constructive conversation with this prick, so he threw him off the show.
"I'm not done talking to you!" "Yeah you are." "No I'm not!" "Yeah you are." Hilarious!
its not like the bums were forced to do it. they agreed, made some money, and were probably happy about it. thats not the point anyhow. my point was that DECENT arguments are better than phil's 0. now reread that a few times.
steppman2
December 14th, 2006, 02:27 PM
bumfights? wtf, only in america...
Right because there aren't homeless people, and assholes anywhere else... :roll:
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
PA
December 14th, 2006, 02:30 PM
dr. phil got fat :roll:
UncoverReality
December 14th, 2006, 02:45 PM
well im kind of on phil's side but that guy had some decent arguments, while phil provided the audience with exactly 0. yet they all instinctively cheered like fucking morons. sheeps like someone said... i hate people like that.
Decent arguments? This is ridiculous. $20 to a homeless person to eat a raw frog? That's not providing them a service, that -is- exploitation. He's not putting these people to work, he's bribing them to allow them to exploit them. Putting them to work would be paying them a -lot- more than a bottle of JD for yanking a tooth out, or whatever.
I've seen bumfights videos, and this jackass is not providing any sort of service to anyone but himself.
Methinks Dr. Phil did one of the best things he could. Seems to me that he suddenly realized that there was no way he could have a constructive conversation with this prick, so he threw him off the show.
"I'm not done talking to you!" "Yeah you are." "No I'm not!" "Yeah you are." Hilarious!
Whether bumfights is right or not, the point is you can look at it from two sides. Do you blame the guy making the shit or the people who buy it? He said it himself.......he's made fucking millions from it. There is obviously a market for this shit. What about those people buying it?
Dr. Phil is a hypocrite....shows like his exploit people in much the same way. There both as bad as each other. A pair of wankers I say.
Trip2Far
December 14th, 2006, 02:46 PM
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
There is a HUGE difference between paying UFC fighters to do what they have trained to do though choice, and telling an alcoholic you'll give him a bottle of JD, or someone this poor they can have $20, for humiliating and degrading themselves for other peoples entertainment. Bum fights is exploitation of people down on their luck, pure and simple, and it sickens me.
That being said, yes, this did look somewhat staged by Dr. Phil, and it also wouldn't surprise me if the hair gag pissed him off, lol.
I have zero respect for the pair of them.
Skyhigh
December 14th, 2006, 03:10 PM
While I don't agree with the bums fights videos, I really do think that the guy (anyone else think he was mocking Dr.Phil with that haircut) has some pretty decent arguments against him. That they both exploit people in almost the same way.
krayzemusic
December 14th, 2006, 03:44 PM
People get exploited all the time, Dr. Phil would does it too. This guy saw an un exploited industry that had a demand and he supplied it and made millions. I don't agree with the guy because he's taking advantage of the desperation and mental illness of homeless people but if he didn't do it someone else would have. The way to solve this problem is to either
a. inflict severe penalties on those involved in the filming, production and distribution of this material
or
b. Everyone can stop being so retarded, grow a spine and stop demanding this shit. No deman no problem
as for Dr. Phil...Get a life you douchebag. You're definately not a hero and your audiance needs to get a life and do something productive.
c stylez 360
December 14th, 2006, 03:50 PM
That guy is a son of a bitch. Haha. Treating bums like that.
The Maddog
December 14th, 2006, 04:14 PM
bumfights? wtf, only in america...
Right because there aren't homeless people, and assholes anywhere else... :roll:
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
WOW - You belive that crap your spewing there?
It is morally diffrent because a) They have nothing. If you havnt eaten a meal in 4 days you'll do pretty much anything for $20 b) a UFC fighter enters the ring knowing he's going to fight. He has homeless people doing all sorts of stupid crap for a pittence whilst he make's a fortune off selling this disgusting sh*t to people like you!
There's a whole argument here but its pointless trying. Dr Phil might be a tool but that guy - urrg - Deserves everything bad thats coming to him!
brownbearclan
December 14th, 2006, 04:29 PM
Dr Phil is a pathetic, pussy whipped, douche bag.
DriZ is right, no way in Hell did Dr Phil not know what was going to be shown or talked about before the show. These shows are planned weeks and sometimes months in advance. They are discussed by the producers and Dr Phil and investigated. All he wanted was a chance to throw someone off his stage and look like a friggin hero!
Yep that's exactly what the situation was. Could also have been the fact of the dude's awesome likeness to Douchebag Phil of which he didn't find very funny lol.
I like watching the Bumfights series, I've seen all 3, but no fucking way would I pay money to support what that guy does. I mean the guy is worth millions and the bums are still homeless and broke. That's the definition of exploitation. Bittorrent FTW.
Bishop
December 14th, 2006, 05:06 PM
phil said that hes not gunna publicize that... and yet he let the clip get air'd or allowed the footage to be leaked... what a fucking cokehead...
dr.phil is as usefull as tits on a bull... IN FACT i think hes about the size of a cow... and we all know hes got fucking flabby tits...
vilecabi.net
December 14th, 2006, 05:38 PM
The hair makes the man!
wannabe me
December 14th, 2006, 05:58 PM
I think Dr. Phil just wanted a chance to publicly humiliate the guy and make a statement about his activities. I'm sure it was staged, but I think he had good intentions in doing so.
Anybody who bullshits himself into thinking he's doing the world a favor by fucking up bums for profit and tries to spread that bullshit to others, deserves to be rudely awakened.
Porn is respectable compared to what he does. Those kinds of videos are just a level above snuff films. I consider those bums to have a lot more class than that jerk.
badger661973
December 14th, 2006, 07:24 PM
quote]
Whether bumfights is right or not, the point is you can look at it from two sides. Do you blame the guy making the shit or the people who buy it? He said it himself.......he's made fucking millions from it. There is obviously a market for this shit. What about those people buying it?
Dr. Phil is a hypocrite....shows like his exploit people in much the same way. There both as bad as each other. A pair of wankers I say.[/quote]
my limey friend, you have hit the nail right on the head. both these egotistical jagoffs bother the crap out of me.... and the bumfights guy- he's made MILLIONS off those dvd's? that really pisses me off, and the only thought that went through my head when he said that was "damn, why didn't I think of that!?"
i fuckin hate homeless people even more than i hate jerks like phil and bumfights guy for making so much $$$ off stupid people.
"drive off the bridge jesus, i'm committing suicide"
Grug
December 14th, 2006, 08:46 PM
How the hell are those bumfight videos legal? If that's not exploitation, i don't know what is. Jackass and all those shows? Fine, do whatever the hell you want to yourself - i'll watch that. But paying homeless people a couple of bucks to do the painful stuff for you... that's as bloody low it gets.
Dr. Phil gives me the shits, but I wish he'd punched that twat's lights out. I worked with homeless guys before and at least 90% of them have serious drug/alcohol issues, it's the reason most of them can't get into shelters. That guy's a prick.
Firep0w3r
December 14th, 2006, 09:36 PM
Well, the only thing this bum fight producer has over the wealthy people during the depression, is the vast amount of money he is making from the films.
During the depression (1930's America), it was not unusual for the wealthy to use the disadvantaged for their entertainment. There were people paid to wear white suits, come to a gathering or party of the upper class and jump into their septic tanks. What fun for the bored wealthy peeps!
In the 1950's there was a show on television I watched with my family called "Queen for a Day". The poorest of the poor pleaded their guts out on nationwide television to prove they were more desperate than the other female contestants. Some were pregnant, no shoes, wearing rags, yet speaking to the master of ceremonies/host dressed in his brand new suit and shiny shoes. *chuckle* er...I mean terrible! The very best they got for crying their eyes out and telling the world their innermost secrets was a washing machine. Usually the prize was a few pair of shoes for the children...so this is not new, just wayyyyyy more profitable!
razzz
December 14th, 2006, 09:58 PM
good publicity
kingbee
December 14th, 2006, 11:12 PM
How can people see what he is doing and think thats acceptable. those people are homeless due to bad circumstances, or bad dicisions. they are desperate for money and will do whatever it takes even if it is just for 20$. nowing this, he exploited them. while they are eating frogs and doing more humiliating things, he is behind the scenes pocketing millions. that is really sickening. he is in no way glorifying or helping or giving an opportunity. he used them and threw them out.
The arguement about Dr. Phil using his guest is retarded and could only apply to the Jerry Springer shot. Dr. Phil does bring people on his show but it is to bring up a new issue that is going on. Plus, he works with the people he brings and helps them through their troubles. I was deeply sickened by what i saw here. Dr. Phil shouldnt have shown that shit in the first place.
Bishop
December 15th, 2006, 12:06 AM
if u have ever given money to a homeless person...
then you are just as guilty as the bum fights guy cuz
they just take that cash to drink, do drugs or get hookers
dont fool urself. just cuz u dont to it to get it on tape
doesnt mean that ur not encouraging or letting it happen.
1 guy just wanted to see their crazy homeless shit and got
it on film and u bust his balls..
was it right. no.
was it funny. yes.
should it have been done. no
am i going to feel bad about it. never
steppman2
December 15th, 2006, 12:08 AM
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
There is a HUGE difference between paying UFC fighters to do what they have trained to do though choice, and telling an alcoholic you'll give him a bottle of JD, or someone this poor they can have $20, for humiliating and degrading themselves for other peoples entertainment. Bum fights is exploitation of people down on their luck, pure and simple, and it sickens me.
That being said, yes, this did look somewhat staged by Dr. Phil, and it also wouldn't surprise me if the hair gag pissed him off, lol.
I have zero respect for the pair of them.
They are given a choice, and are paid for what they do.
steppman2
December 15th, 2006, 12:15 AM
bumfights? wtf, only in america...
Right because there aren't homeless people, and assholes anywhere else... :roll:
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
WOW - You belive that crap your spewing there?
It is morally diffrent because a) They have nothing. If you havnt eaten a meal in 4 days you'll do pretty much anything for $20 b) a UFC fighter enters the ring knowing he's going to fight. He has homeless people doing all sorts of stupid crap for a pittence whilst he make's a fortune off selling this disgusting sh*t to people like you!
There's a whole argument here but its pointless trying. Dr Phil might be a tool but that guy - urrg - Deserves everything bad thats coming to him!
A : He gave the guy $20, that's payment rendered, and they both walked away happy.
B : You assume incorrect on both counts...
B1 : The homeless people know they will fight just as much as the UFC fighters, notice is given and payment is made.
B2 : The only difference is the pay scale, which to them, is much more than the average donation they get from begging. Also, I've never seen more than an ad for these videos, I just don't find them that interesting.
guidedbyvoices
December 15th, 2006, 12:23 AM
I just can't get past the fact that dude copied Dorkus Phil's look to a TeeeeeEEEEEEE!!!!......heheheheheeeee@!@!!!1111 aaaAAAAhahahashjvselfgjertghoesmlhbjmfd!!!! LOLOLL
http://www.abcwebworx.com/smilies/happy/happy20.gif
Bishop
December 15th, 2006, 01:22 AM
B2 : The only difference is the pay scale, which to them, is much more than the average donation they get from begging.
dont fucking kid urself.. it might be more per donation than they usually get but per hour... a non drug addicted bum with a good gimmic can make more per hour than most people ud know... and they dont pay taxes on that shit...
lets say ur a squeegy kid. u wash 5 windows per red light. u make 2 bucks per red light cuz some wont pay at all. lets say that the lights only change every minute. ur looking at a decent ammount of money for ur 5 hour shift and its all tax free...
libtech158
December 15th, 2006, 01:35 AM
have you ever watched the bum fight series? they are fucking hilarious.
Bishop
December 15th, 2006, 01:44 AM
big time ;) hehehehe
Josh85
December 15th, 2006, 02:29 AM
LMAO
Awesome haircut
kungfuf8r
December 15th, 2006, 02:39 AM
LOL "Dr.Phil" sucks! if he thought it was CLEARLY INAPPROPRIATE..why the hell did he even show it let alone bring the producer on his stage?? that's right, he wants to make himself look good (like always)...always trying to use big words
and that was funny...how he was like "yea u are..." over and over
manchild
December 15th, 2006, 03:12 AM
i registered just because i wanted to share my reply. my 2 cents, dr phil just gave this guy a buttload of publicity, he made himself look weak and now i think dr phil condones the child molesters that come on his show that dont get kicked off, instead he kicks off a guy with a bad ass haircut.
Maelstromcc
December 15th, 2006, 03:41 AM
ya dont seee dr phil digging toooo deep into his pockets to help those ppl.
speeddrift
December 15th, 2006, 05:31 AM
both idiots.....what was the point of invited him to the show to kick him off....it seemed sadly rehearsed to me....bum fights guy is a total loser...but so is dr. phil for pulling that garbage and then trying to act like he didn't know what bum fight was all about. Kinda funny that the dude looked like a small dr. phil.....same suit.....same hair. (probably his brother and they are both promoting eachother!)
Bishop
December 15th, 2006, 12:43 PM
ya dont seee dr phil digging toooo deep into his pockets to help those ppl.
of course not... hes too busy fucking his 19 year old patients
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dr_Phil#Ethical_violation_in_Texas
Blackmagic
December 15th, 2006, 03:00 PM
Although Bum Fights is out of order, I find it funny that they had him on the show only to tell him to leave after the video. Also, I wonder how many of the people that booed in that audience are about to go and buy Bum Fights.
steppman2
December 15th, 2006, 03:26 PM
http://www.thephoenix.com/article_ektid7852.aspx
#4
DandruffBGone
December 15th, 2006, 03:31 PM
Difference between a UFC fighter who has contracted to fight for pay, and a homeless person who agrees to do something for a lousy twenty bucks can be summed up with one word........"desperation".
Those that find watching desperate people doing something degrading amusing are pretty hollow, immature, and lack any hint of understanding or compassion for their fellow man. Go for it if you want to, but it's pretty damn sad and says a lot about the human race IMO.
I have a well developed sense of humour, we have a lot of fun in my house....more than most......but these bum fight vids are despicable.
As for Doc Phil - a complete ego boosting set up on the bum fights guy. They're both as bad as the other.
ps: Bishop you said this "if u have ever given money to a homeless person...
then you are just as guilty as the bum fights guy cuz
they just take that cash to drink, do drugs or get hookers"
You are a smart guy and you make me laugh every day, but this is utter bullshit. I give money often to poor people and my decision is that once it passes from my hand to theirs it belongs to them. My hope is that they'll buy food (but of course they probably won't) but it's not up to me to judge what they do with anything I give them. It's their decision once they have the cash, not mine. No time to argue. In the library and have limited time left - again. So frustrating. Power's out at my place. Is there an electrician in the house?
nwoantibody
December 15th, 2006, 03:57 PM
Sounds to me Dr.Phil is another fucking hypocrite.
One hypocrite bashing another...
Ridiculous.
crazyjoe
December 15th, 2006, 05:38 PM
The guy is making millions and he's paying homeless $20 to do shit......what a humanitarian :roll:
They both exploit people and their problems. Why else would they video tape what they do? Are you telling me Dr. Phill couldn't help people without a show?
barcode23
December 15th, 2006, 06:27 PM
Bumfights suck! And that piece of shit that created it should be shot up; especially for believing half the shit that comes out of his own mouth. He isn't helping out anyone except his banker and himself. You can tell that he has an IQ of about 30 also.
blaike
December 15th, 2006, 10:02 PM
Half of you are retarded and can't come up with good arguments. First, I don't advocate what Bumfights does. I don't think he's doing it because he wants to get Bums off the street, but rather to line his own pockets. But again, I'm not against what he's doing. He is not forcing the bums to do it, it's their choice.
It's like giving full rights and paychecks to illegal immigrants. I see no wrong in paying an illegal immigrant below minimum wage. They shouldn't be in fucking America anyways. If they're taking the minimum wage pay, its clearly something better than what they had in Mexico or wherever they came from.
I think the concepts are relevant, because as we should all feel sorry for the homeless and the poor, who threw who's life away? Admittedly, not all the homeless people were people who got kicked out of school for drugs or alcohol or whatever, and many are war veterans for which I sympathize. But those who are against bumfights... if you knew you were going to die in three days from undernourishment, would you not EAT a raw frog and get $20 bucks? The person who offers that would be a fuckin hero.
I think Dr. Phil is a dumbass to have the producer come to the show just to have him kicked off. And the applause? what bullshit.
Barcode: "You can tell that he has an IQ of about 30 also."
Are you judging him by his looks or from his valid point about Dr. Phil? Because Dr. Phil DOES make money off other people's problems.
Bishop
December 15th, 2006, 10:31 PM
http://wilderdom.com/intelligence/IQWhatScoresMean.html
Low IQ & Mental Retardation
* 50-70 - Mild mental retardation (85%)
* 35-50 - Moderate mental retardation (10%)
* 20-35 - Severe mental retardation (4%)
* IQ < 20 - Profound mental retardation (1%)
wannabe me
December 16th, 2006, 11:03 AM
The guy is making millions and he's paying homeless $20 to do shit......what a humanitarian :roll:
They both exploit people and their problems. Why else would they video tape what they do? Are you telling me Dr. Phill couldn't help people without a show?
The difference between the two is class. Dr. Phil, like or agree with him or not, has a certain amount credibility in society. He's put in a similar class as Oprah, not Gerry Springer. People like Maury and Montel fall somewhere in between.
Ty on the other hand is a punk on steroids version of Gerry Springer, with all the stops taken out. He has no class whatsoever that I can detect. The two are not in the same league, ballpark or even game. He makes Gerry Springer look like Jerry Fallwell.
A case can be made that Dr. Phil helps a lot of people through his shows by showing them that others have similar problems to theirs and how these problems can be dealt with. I see it as legitimate educational as well as entertaining programming. Does he need a show to help people? For that many, yes. You can't possibly reach the numbers of people he does without a show, and staying in private practice.
Is it about money? For both I think it's more about the game. With Ty it's about shocking as many people as possible that he can get away with. It's his way of "living on the edge". With Dr. Phil it's about helping as many people as possible through life's problems. The money is a separate issue and certainly not the only motivation.
gwane
December 16th, 2006, 11:56 AM
well im kind of on phil's side but that guy had some decent arguments, while phil provided the audience with exactly 0. yet they all instinctively cheered like fucking morons. sheeps like someone said... i hate people like that.
Decent arguments? This is ridiculous. $20 to a homeless person to eat a raw frog? That's not providing them a service, that -is- exploitation. He's not putting these people to work, he's bribing them to allow them to exploit them. Putting them to work would be paying them a -lot- more than a bottle of JD for yanking a tooth out, or whatever.
I've seen bumfights videos, and this jackass is not providing any sort of service to anyone but himself.
Methinks Dr. Phil did one of the best things he could. Seems to me that he suddenly realized that there was no way he could have a constructive conversation with this prick, so he threw him off the show.
"I'm not done talking to you!" "Yeah you are." "No I'm not!" "Yeah you are." Hilarious!
Im with ya on this one , then people looking at each other with shit grins on there faces wondering what wrong with the world ... Just because that person on the internet is not you does not mean it won't someone that important to you.
bogrut
December 16th, 2006, 06:59 PM
Phil's a phriggin phool.
Asskicker
December 16th, 2006, 07:05 PM
You'd better wake up! Pull your head out of your......
steppman2
December 16th, 2006, 08:02 PM
The two are not in the same league, ballpark or even game. He makes Gerry Springer look like Jerry Fallwell.
I won't lie, I literally laughed out loud.
The Maddog
December 16th, 2006, 09:41 PM
bumfights? wtf, only in america...
Right because there aren't homeless people, and assholes anywhere else... :roll:
And also I don't see any coercion going on here, they all accept the payment and perform the service. This is not morally different from paying a UFC fighter to beat up on another fighter in front of a bunch of fans for the purpose of making money.
WOW - You belive that crap your spewing there?
It is morally diffrent because a) They have nothing. If you havnt eaten a meal in 4 days you'll do pretty much anything for $20 b) a UFC fighter enters the ring knowing he's going to fight. He has homeless people doing all sorts of stupid crap for a pittence whilst he make's a fortune off selling this disgusting sh*t to people like you!
There's a whole argument here but its pointless trying. Dr Phil might be a tool but that guy - urrg - Deserves everything bad thats coming to him!
A : He gave the guy $20, that's payment rendered, and they both walked away happy.
B : You assume incorrect on both counts...
B1 : The homeless people know they will fight just as much as the UFC fighters, notice is given and payment is made.
B2 : The only difference is the pay scale, which to them, is much more than the average donation they get from begging. Also, I've never seen more than an ad for these videos, I just don't find them that interesting.
your answers shows what sort of scum you are. if you can justify the degradation of another human being, no matter what the context, you are a grade a asshole! I wont waste my coments on a peice of crap like you any longer!
Oh and blaike. Get a grip on reality you douchebag!
Whilst I'm no great fan of illegals (we have them in the UK too) I have to accept that some, just some are here to support their familys. whilst not the case for all, it is for some!
If you had no income, no oppertunitys and a family to support what would you do?
Stop seeing all this crap as black and white. each case is unique!
aznlilboiz
December 17th, 2006, 12:12 AM
trash people always make trash stuff.
steppman2
December 17th, 2006, 12:28 AM
your answers shows what sort of scum you are. if you can justify the degradation of another human being, no matter what the context, you are a grade a asshole! I wont waste my coments on a peice of crap like you any longer!
Oh and blaike. Get a grip on reality you douchebag!
Whilst I'm no great fan of illegals (we have them in the UK too) I have to accept that some, just some are here to support their familys. whilst not the case for all, it is for some!
If you had no income, no oppertunitys and a family to support what would you do?
Stop seeing all this crap as black and white. each case is unique!
You sound like you're 10, no perspective, no life knowledge.
Go get a job.
Combat Medic
December 17th, 2006, 03:25 PM
your answers shows what sort of scum you are. if you can justify the degradation of another human being, no matter what the context, you are a grade a asshole! I wont waste my coments on a peice of crap like you any longer!
Oh and blaike. Get a grip on reality you douchebag!
Whilst I'm no great fan of illegals (we have them in the UK too) I have to accept that some, just some are here to support their familys. whilst not the case for all, it is for some!
If you had no income, no oppertunitys and a family to support what would you do?
Stop seeing all this crap as black and white. each case is unique!
You sound like you're 10, no perspective, no life knowledge.
Go get a job.
ill pay you both 20$ each to just duke it out instead of type out if youll sign right here x__________
blaike
December 17th, 2006, 03:51 PM
Oh and blaike. Get a grip on reality you douchebag!
Whilst I'm no great fan of illegals (we have them in the UK too) I have to accept that some, just some are here to support their familys. whilst not the case for all, it is for some!
If you had no income, no oppertunitys and a family to support what would you do?
Stop seeing all this crap as black and white. each case is unique!
Personal attacks already hm? It's alright. It's what most people do when they can't come up with a decent argument. I do realize that people come from other countries with job opportunities, as I stated. I don't care at all if they come here to support their family in Mexico or wherever, but I'm saying they shouldn't have the same privileges as an American citizen. I'm not being racist, but America is not a fucking charity.
They should accept what they get. If its not better than what they get in Mexico, then they should go back to where their family is.
If I fell under all those conditions (no income, opportunities, etc.), then I would, yes, go to another country and find a better paying job.
Bishop
December 17th, 2006, 04:25 PM
time to ban some of these fuckers...
Big Ozzie
December 17th, 2006, 09:17 PM
Thread locked until a Mod can sort out, edit and PM those who chose to make this a Flame Fest!
vBulletin® v3.7.2, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.